10 Comments
Aug 4Liked by Parker Peevyhouse

This is a great articulation of what the mystery-as-puzzle genre needs to work properly! I’ve noticed that even Sherlock Holmes is, fascinatingly, useless from this perspective: he solves cases because he recognised someone (and didn’t say so) or by knowing the characteristics of a (fictional!) species of snake.

Expand full comment
author

Sherlock Holmes isn’t usually fair play. He often withhold crucial clues from the reader to provide a dramatic ending. I especially love The Hounds Of The Baskervilles, but I’m not sure reader can really solve it before the solution comes up. It’s a great gothic tale, though.

Expand full comment
Aug 4Liked by Parker Peevyhouse

Good list! I have to admit I hated the reveal in The Murder of Roger Ackroyd. I thought it was extremely unfair and cheater-ish and I haven't read any more of Christie's books (though I do intend to and have watched all the David Suchet Poirot episodes).

Expand full comment
author

I liked that book but I don’t remember whether it follows these rules. My favorite Christie books are probably Death on the Nile and Five Little Pigs, which are very tricky to solve but perfectly fair.

Also, David Suchet is brilliant!

Expand full comment
Aug 4Liked by Parker Peevyhouse

I’ll check those two out!

Expand full comment

Brilliant! I loved this summary & agree a mystery is best when it “plays fairly.”

Expand full comment
author

Thanks! Hope you find a great mystery to read.

Expand full comment

How do you feel about KNIVES OUT? I loved the first one, but did you think they cut corners in the sequel?

Expand full comment
author

I was actually thinking about writing a post about the sequel! I have a lot of thoughts about why it doesn’t work as well as the original.

Expand full comment

Please write about it! I loved the plot twists, but I thought the whole "having a secret twin" thing was a bit of a shortcut, not unlike Shakespeare did! 😂 He certainly loved twins too.

Expand full comment